Chainflip vs Rebex
Chainflip has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 8.3 against 3.1, and Privacy 7.1 against 2.7.
Chainflip
Cross-chain DEX protocol for native BTC, ETH, SOL and stablecoin swaps
Privacy
7.1/ 10
Strong
Safety
8.3/ 10
Strong
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
Rebex
No-account instant exchange with automated risk checks and a document clause
Privacy
2.7/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.1/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Chainflip | Rebex | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID in rare cases | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, SOL, USDC, USDT, DOT, TRX, FLIP | BTC, ETH, XMR, USDT, LTC, SOL, XRP, DASH |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Not published | Fee included in the quoted rate (terms 5.4); 10% (minimum $100) to return assets blocked by AML checks |
| Jurisdiction | Germany | Not published |
| Not available in | Persons subject to sanctions regimes are barred by the front-end terms; no country list published | United States and its territories, all EU/EEA states, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Crimea, Sudan, Syria and UN-sanctioned countries |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Chainflip
No email neededNo phone neededOpen sourceNon-custodialIndependent auditLegal entity disclosed
Both
No registration
Only Rebex
Accepts MoneroCustodialClosed sourceAnonymous operatorMay request IDAML screeningExcludes US users
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is Chainflip or Rebex safer?
Chainflip has the higher Safety grade: Chainflip 8.3, Rebex 3.1, out of 10.
Does Chainflip or Rebex require KYC?
Chainflip is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases). Rebex is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
Chainflip has 0 and Rebex has 0 documented incidents in the registry.