Chainflip vs Majestic Bank
It is a trade-off. Chainflip has the higher Safety grade (8.3 against 3.0), while Majestic Bank has the higher Privacy grade (7.6 against 7.1).
Chainflip
Cross-chain DEX protocol for native BTC, ETH, SOL and stablecoin swaps
Privacy
7.1/ 10
Strong
Safety
8.3/ 10
Strong
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
Majestic Bank
Small no-account BTC/XMR swap service with an onion address; clearnet site unreachable
Privacy
7.6/ 10
Strong
Safety
3.0/ 10
Poor
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Suspended Full review →
Side by side
| Chainflip | Majestic Bank | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID in rare cases | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, SOL, USDC, USDT, DOT, TRX, FLIP | XMR, BTC, LTC, BCH, FIRO, WOW |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Not published | 0-2% depending on reserves (FAQ); homepage showed ~0.5% |
| Jurisdiction | Germany | Not published |
| Not available in | Persons subject to sanctions regimes are barred by the front-end terms; no country list published | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Chainflip
No email neededNo phone neededOpen sourceNon-custodialIndependent auditLegal entity disclosed
Both
No registration
Only Majestic Bank
Accepts MoneroTor onion serviceWorks without JavaScriptOwn liquidityClosed sourceAnonymous operator
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is Chainflip or Majestic Bank safer?
Chainflip has the higher Safety grade: Chainflip 8.3, Majestic Bank 3.0, out of 10.
Does Chainflip or Majestic Bank require KYC?
Chainflip is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases). Majestic Bank is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Chainflip has 0 and Majestic Bank has 0 documented incidents in the registry.