BitFlaming vs eigenwallet
eigenwallet has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.0 against 3.6, and Privacy 8.9 against 1.5.
BitFlaming
Semi-automatic exchanger working with Russian bank cards, with mandatory AML checks
Privacy
1.5/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.6/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
eigenwallet
Desktop wallet for peer-to-peer BTC-to-XMR atomic swaps, formerly UnstoppableSwap
Privacy
8.9/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.0/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BitFlaming | eigenwallet | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID never required |
| Custody | Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | Email required | No account needed |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC, XMR |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, Bank transfer | Crypto, Monero |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Decentralised / none |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BitFlaming
Requires emailThird-party liquidityAML screeningMay request IDRefund without IDClosed sourceAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Nothing distinct
Only eigenwallet
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroOpen sourceNon-custodial
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is BitFlaming or eigenwallet safer?
eigenwallet has the higher Safety grade: BitFlaming 3.6, eigenwallet 7.0, out of 10.
Does BitFlaming or eigenwallet require KYC?
BitFlaming is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). eigenwallet is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
BitFlaming has 0 and eigenwallet has 0 documented incidents in the registry.