BitFlaming vs Chainflip
Chainflip has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 8.3 against 3.6, and Privacy 7.1 against 1.5.
BitFlaming
Semi-automatic exchanger working with Russian bank cards, with mandatory AML checks
Privacy
1.5/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.6/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Chainflip
Cross-chain DEX protocol for native BTC, ETH, SOL and stablecoin swaps
Privacy
7.1/ 10
Strong
Safety
8.3/ 10
Strong
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BitFlaming | Chainflip | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID in rare cases |
| Custody | Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | Email required | No account needed |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC, ETH, SOL, USDC, USDT, DOT, TRX, FLIP |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, Bank transfer | Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Germany |
| Not available in | Not published | Persons subject to sanctions regimes are barred by the front-end terms; no country list published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BitFlaming
Requires emailThird-party liquidityAML screeningMay request IDRefund without IDClosed sourceAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Nothing distinct
Only Chainflip
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededOpen sourceNon-custodialIndependent auditLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is BitFlaming or Chainflip safer?
Chainflip has the higher Safety grade: BitFlaming 3.6, Chainflip 8.3, out of 10.
Does BitFlaming or Chainflip require KYC?
BitFlaming is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). Chainflip is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases).
Which has more incidents on record?
BitFlaming has 0 and Chainflip has 0 documented incidents in the registry.