eigenwallet vs WizardSwap
eigenwallet has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.0 against 5.5, and Privacy 8.9 against 8.2.
eigenwallet
Desktop wallet for peer-to-peer BTC-to-XMR atomic swaps, formerly UnstoppableSwap
Privacy
8.9/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.0/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
WizardSwap
No-JavaScript swap service for privacy coins that says it uses its own liquidity
Privacy
8.2/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| eigenwallet | WizardSwap | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, XMR | BTC, XMR, LTC, ETH, ZEC, DASH, FIRO, PART |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Not published | About 2.2% fixed on most trades; up to 10% extra on low-liquidity coins (FAQ) |
| Jurisdiction | Decentralised / none | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only eigenwallet
Open sourceNon-custodial
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts Monero
Only WizardSwap
Tor onion serviceWorks without JavaScriptOwn liquidityClosed sourceAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programmeRefund without ID
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is eigenwallet or WizardSwap safer?
eigenwallet has the higher Safety grade: eigenwallet 7.0, WizardSwap 5.5, out of 10.
Does eigenwallet or WizardSwap require KYC?
eigenwallet is KYC level 0 (ID never required). WizardSwap is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
eigenwallet has 0 and WizardSwap has 0 documented incidents in the registry.