eigenwallet vs NEAR Intents
eigenwallet has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.0 against 4.7, and Privacy 8.9 against 6.4.
eigenwallet
Desktop wallet for peer-to-peer BTC-to-XMR atomic swaps, formerly UnstoppableSwap
Privacy
8.9/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.0/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
NEAR Intents
Cross-chain swap front end where market makers compete to fill each order
Privacy
6.4/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.7/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| eigenwallet | NEAR Intents | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR | BTC, ETH, SOL, NEAR, ZEC, USDC, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | Not published | 0.2% front-end swap fee plus a 0.0001% protocol fee (per docs) |
| Jurisdiction | Decentralised / none | Not published |
| Not available in | Not published | Restricted persons and comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions; geo-blocking may be applied (no country list in the terms) |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only eigenwallet
No phone neededAccepts MoneroOpen sourceNon-custodial
Both
No registrationNo email needed
Only NEAR Intents
AML screening
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is eigenwallet or NEAR Intents safer?
eigenwallet has the higher Safety grade: eigenwallet 7.0, NEAR Intents 4.7, out of 10.
Does eigenwallet or NEAR Intents require KYC?
eigenwallet is KYC level 0 (ID never required). NEAR Intents is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
eigenwallet has 0 and NEAR Intents has 0 documented incidents in the registry.