Chainflip vs RubyCash
Chainflip has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 8.3 against 3.6, and Privacy 7.1 against 2.0.
Chainflip
Cross-chain DEX protocol for native BTC, ETH, SOL and stablecoin swaps
Privacy
7.1/ 10
Strong
Safety
8.3/ 10
Strong
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
RubyCash
Order-based crypto exchanger with risk-level blocking and ID on suspicion
Privacy
2.0/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.6/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Chainflip | RubyCash | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID in rare cases | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | Email optional |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, SOL, USDC, USDT, DOT, TRX, FLIP | BTC, ETH, USDT, DASH, XMR, TON, ZEC, LTC, XLM, ARB |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Not published | Refunds after a mistake or cancellation carry a 5% handling fee plus network fee |
| Jurisdiction | Germany | Not published |
| Not available in | Persons subject to sanctions regimes are barred by the front-end terms; no country list published | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Chainflip
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededOpen sourceNon-custodialIndependent auditLegal entity disclosed
Both
Nothing distinct
Only RubyCash
Accepts MoneroRequires emailAML screeningMay request IDClosed sourceAnonymous operator
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is Chainflip or RubyCash safer?
Chainflip has the higher Safety grade: Chainflip 8.3, RubyCash 3.6, out of 10.
Does Chainflip or RubyCash require KYC?
Chainflip is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases). RubyCash is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
Chainflip has 0 and RubyCash has 0 documented incidents in the registry.