BitFlaming vs Godex
Godex has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.3 against 3.6, and Privacy 7.6 against 1.5.
BitFlaming
Semi-automatic exchanger working with Russian bank cards, with mandatory AML checks
Privacy
1.5/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.6/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Godex
Registration-free instant exchange with no stated volume limits
Privacy
7.6/ 10
Strong
Safety
6.3/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BitFlaming | Godex | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | Email required | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC, ETH, XMR, USDT, LTC, ZEC, DASH |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, Bank transfer | Crypto, Monero |
| Limits | Not published | Site states there is no upper limit on swap volume |
| Founded | Not published | 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Seychelles (per third-party review quoted on site) |
| Not available in | Not published | US, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Sudan, Crimea, Bangladesh, Bolivia (terms s.3.2) |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BitFlaming
Requires emailThird-party liquidityAML screeningMay request IDAnonymous operator
Both
Refund without IDClosed sourceRuns an affiliate programme
Only Godex
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroExcludes US users5+ years operating
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is BitFlaming or Godex safer?
Godex has the higher Safety grade: BitFlaming 3.6, Godex 6.3, out of 10.
Does BitFlaming or Godex require KYC?
BitFlaming is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). Godex is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
BitFlaming has 0 and Godex has 0 documented incidents in the registry.