ETZ-Swap vs n.exchange
It is a trade-off. n.exchange has the higher Safety grade (6.1 against 5.2), while ETZ-Swap has the higher Privacy grade (7.5 against 3.1).
ETZ-Swap
Accountless instant swap that says it trades from its own reserves
Privacy
7.5/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
n.exchange
Costa Rica-registered instant swap with internal reserves and a formal CDD/EDD programme
Privacy
3.1/ 10
Poor
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| ETZ-Swap | n.exchange | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, USDT, SOL, LTC, TRX | BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, SOL, LTC, XRP, XMR, PAXG |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Not published | Fees included in quotes; terms allow an AML/KYC compliance fee of up to 5% and up to 5% on approved refunds |
| Founded | Not published | 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Costa Rica |
| Not available in | Not published | United States, United Kingdom, Iceland, Morocco, Algeria, Ecuador, Bolivia, North Macedonia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, China, Kyrgyzstan, Bahrain, Namibia, Qatar, Afghanistan, North Korea, Syria, Iran, Cuba, Belarus, Crimea, Venezuela, Russia |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only ETZ-Swap
No email neededNo phone neededTor onion serviceWorks without JavaScriptRefund without IDAnonymous operator
Both
No registrationAccepts MoneroOwn liquidityAML screeningClosed sourceRuns an affiliate programme
Only n.exchange
May request IDExcludes US usersLegal entity disclosed5+ years operating
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is ETZ-Swap or n.exchange safer?
n.exchange has the higher Safety grade: ETZ-Swap 5.2, n.exchange 6.1, out of 10.
Does ETZ-Swap or n.exchange require KYC?
ETZ-Swap is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). n.exchange is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
ETZ-Swap has 0 and n.exchange has 0 documented incidents in the registry.