Chainflip vs NEAR Intents
Chainflip has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 8.3 against 4.7, and Privacy 7.1 against 6.4.
Chainflip
Cross-chain DEX protocol for native BTC, ETH, SOL and stablecoin swaps
Privacy
7.1/ 10
Strong
Safety
8.3/ 10
Strong
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
NEAR Intents
Cross-chain swap front end where market makers compete to fill each order
Privacy
6.4/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.7/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Chainflip | NEAR Intents | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID in rare cases | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, SOL, USDC, USDT, DOT, TRX, FLIP | BTC, ETH, SOL, NEAR, ZEC, USDC, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto |
| Fees | Not published | 0.2% front-end swap fee plus a 0.0001% protocol fee (per docs) |
| Jurisdiction | Germany | Not published |
| Not available in | Persons subject to sanctions regimes are barred by the front-end terms; no country list published | Restricted persons and comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions; geo-blocking may be applied (no country list in the terms) |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Chainflip
No phone neededOpen sourceNon-custodialIndependent auditLegal entity disclosed
Both
No registrationNo email needed
Only NEAR Intents
AML screening
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is Chainflip or NEAR Intents safer?
Chainflip has the higher Safety grade: Chainflip 8.3, NEAR Intents 4.7, out of 10.
Does Chainflip or NEAR Intents require KYC?
Chainflip is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases). NEAR Intents is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Chainflip has 0 and NEAR Intents has 0 documented incidents in the registry.