Bitania vs ETZ-Swap
Bitania has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.4 against 5.2, and Privacy 8.5 against 7.5.
Bitania
Instant crypto swap paying out from its own liquidity, with PGP-signed swap receipts and a SimpleX bot
Privacy
8.5/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.4/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
ETZ-Swap
Accountless instant swap that says it trades from its own reserves
Privacy
7.5/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Bitania | ETZ-Swap | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Instant Swaps | Instant Swaps |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, LTC, XMR, TRX, ETH, SOL, AVAX, USDT, USDC | BTC, XMR, ETH, USDT, SOL, LTC, TRX |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | 0.4% floating, 0.8% fixed; payout network fee paid by Bitania; refund fee withheld on refunds | Not published |
| Limits | Per-pair minimums and maximums shown before confirming | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | Panama | Not published |
| Not available in | Cuba, North Korea, Syria, and the Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions; anyone under sanctions (terms s.2) | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Bitania
Legal entity disclosed
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroOwn liquidityRefund without IDClosed sourceRuns an affiliate programme
Only ETZ-Swap
Tor onion serviceWorks without JavaScriptAML screeningAnonymous operator
Where they sit among instant swaps
Questions
Is Bitania or ETZ-Swap safer?
Bitania has the higher Safety grade: Bitania 6.4, ETZ-Swap 5.2, out of 10.
Does Bitania or ETZ-Swap require KYC?
Bitania is KYC level 0 (ID never required). ETZ-Swap is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Bitania has 0 and ETZ-Swap has 0 documented incidents in the registry.