Flashift vs TorrentSwap
It is a trade-off. Flashift has the higher Safety grade (4.2 against 3.4), while TorrentSwap has the higher Privacy grade (3.4 against 2.9).
Flashift
Swap aggregator comparing fixed and floating rates from partner exchanges
Privacy
2.9/ 10
Poor
Safety
4.2/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
TorrentSwap
Cross-chain swap aggregator routing via Chainflip, NEAR Intents and Flashnet, no account
Privacy
3.4/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.4/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Flashift | TorrentSwap | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, BNB | BTC, ETH, SOL, USDT, USDC, LTC, ZEC, DOGE |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | No fee added by the aggregator; partner fees are included in the quoted rate | TorrentSwap, protocol and network fees included in the quoted amount; a flat 0.5% TorrentSwap fee is stated for API and agent swaps |
| Limits | Not published | Minimums, and sometimes maximums, set by the executing protocol and shown in the swap box |
| Jurisdiction | Australia | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Flashift
Accepts MoneroLegal entity disclosedMay request ID
Both
No registrationThird-party liquidityAML screening
Only TorrentSwap
No email neededNo phone neededClosed sourceAnonymous operator
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is Flashift or TorrentSwap safer?
Flashift has the higher Safety grade: Flashift 4.2, TorrentSwap 3.4, out of 10.
Does Flashift or TorrentSwap require KYC?
Flashift is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). TorrentSwap is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
Flashift has 0 and TorrentSwap has 0 documented incidents in the registry.