AnonExch vs Flashift
AnonExch has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 4.3 against 4.2, and Privacy 8.7 against 2.9.
AnonExch
Swap aggregator whose terms rule out KYC, AML screening and held funds
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
4.3/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Flashift
Swap aggregator comparing fixed and floating rates from partner exchanges
Privacy
2.9/ 10
Poor
Safety
4.2/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AnonExch | Flashift | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, ZEC | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, BNB |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Homepage: fees typically 0.4%, already included in the quoted receive amount | No fee added by the aggregator; partner fees are included in the quoted rate |
| Limits | Per-asset minimums; no maximum stated | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Australia |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AnonExch
No email neededNo phone neededTor onion serviceNo-logs policyRefund without IDClosed sourceAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationAccepts MoneroThird-party liquidity
Only Flashift
Legal entity disclosedAML screeningMay request ID
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is AnonExch or Flashift safer?
AnonExch has the higher Safety grade: AnonExch 4.3, Flashift 4.2, out of 10.
Does AnonExch or Flashift require KYC?
AnonExch is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Flashift is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
AnonExch has 0 and Flashift has 0 documented incidents in the registry.