CypherGoat vs Flashift
CypherGoat has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.2 against 4.2, and Privacy 5.4 against 2.9.
CypherGoat
Swap aggregator with an open-source front end and Tor access
Privacy
5.4/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Flashift
Swap aggregator comparing fixed and floating rates from partner exchanges
Privacy
2.9/ 10
Poor
Safety
4.2/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| CypherGoat | Flashift | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, BCH, SOL, DOGE | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, BNB |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Lightning | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Typically 0.4–0.6% per swap, per the site | No fee added by the aggregator; partner fees are included in the quoted rate |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Australia |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only CypherGoat
No email neededNo phone neededTor onion serviceAccepts LightningOpen sourceRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationAccepts MoneroThird-party liquidity
Only Flashift
Legal entity disclosedAML screeningMay request ID
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is CypherGoat or Flashift safer?
CypherGoat has the higher Safety grade: CypherGoat 5.2, Flashift 4.2, out of 10.
Does CypherGoat or Flashift require KYC?
CypherGoat is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). Flashift is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
CypherGoat has 0 and Flashift has 0 documented incidents in the registry.