AnonExch vs ShapeShift
It is a trade-off. ShapeShift has the higher Safety grade (6.2 against 4.3), while AnonExch has the higher Privacy grade (8.7 against 7.1).
AnonExch
Swap aggregator whose terms rule out KYC, AML screening and held funds
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
4.3/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
ShapeShift
DAO-run open-source wallet and DEX aggregator for multichain swaps
Privacy
7.1/ 10
Strong
Safety
6.2/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AnonExch | ShapeShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, ZEC | BTC, ETH, RUNE, CACAO, ATOM, DOGE, LTC, BCH, SOL |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | Homepage: fees typically 0.4%, already included in the quoted receive amount | Not published |
| Limits | Per-asset minimums; no maximum stated | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AnonExch
Tor onion serviceAccepts MoneroNo-logs policyRefund without IDClosed sourceAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededThird-party liquidity
Only ShapeShift
Open source5+ years operating
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is AnonExch or ShapeShift safer?
ShapeShift has the higher Safety grade: AnonExch 4.3, ShapeShift 6.2, out of 10.
Does AnonExch or ShapeShift require KYC?
AnonExch is KYC level 0 (ID never required). ShapeShift is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
AnonExch has 0 and ShapeShift has 0 documented incidents in the registry.