AnonExch vs B2P Central
It is a trade-off. B2P Central has the higher Safety grade (4.4 against 4.3), while AnonExch has the higher Privacy grade (8.7 against 7.7).
AnonExch
Swap aggregator whose terms rule out KYC, AML screening and held funds
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
4.3/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
B2P Central
Free comparison of P2P bitcoin offers, swap rates, loans and gift cards; never handles funds
Privacy
7.7/ 10
Strong
Safety
4.4/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AnonExch | B2P Central | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, ZEC | BTC, XMR |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | Homepage: fees typically 0.4%, already included in the quoted receive amount | No fees (homepage: "0% B2P Central fees") |
| Limits | Per-asset minimums; no maximum stated | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AnonExch
Tor onion serviceAccepts MoneroNo-logs policyRefund without IDClosed sourceAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededThird-party liquidity
Only B2P Central
Nothing distinct
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is AnonExch or B2P Central safer?
B2P Central has the higher Safety grade: AnonExch 4.3, B2P Central 4.4, out of 10.
Does AnonExch or B2P Central require KYC?
AnonExch is KYC level 0 (ID never required). B2P Central is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
AnonExch has 0 and B2P Central has 0 documented incidents in the registry.