CypherGoat vs ShapeShift
ShapeShift has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.2 against 5.2, and Privacy 7.1 against 5.4.
CypherGoat
Swap aggregator with an open-source front end and Tor access
Privacy
5.4/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
ShapeShift
DAO-run open-source wallet and DEX aggregator for multichain swaps
Privacy
7.1/ 10
Strong
Safety
6.2/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| CypherGoat | ShapeShift | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, BCH, SOL, DOGE | BTC, ETH, RUNE, CACAO, ATOM, DOGE, LTC, BCH, SOL |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Lightning | Crypto |
| Fees | Typically 0.4–0.6% per swap, per the site | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only CypherGoat
Tor onion serviceAccepts MoneroAccepts LightningRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededOpen sourceThird-party liquidity
Only ShapeShift
5+ years operating
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is CypherGoat or ShapeShift safer?
ShapeShift has the higher Safety grade: CypherGoat 5.2, ShapeShift 6.2, out of 10.
Does CypherGoat or ShapeShift require KYC?
CypherGoat is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). ShapeShift is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
CypherGoat has 0 and ShapeShift has 0 documented incidents in the registry.