B2P Central vs SwapZilla
B2P Central has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 4.4 against 3.0, and Privacy 7.7 against 3.1.
B2P Central
Free comparison of P2P bitcoin offers, swap rates, loans and gift cards; never handles funds
Privacy
7.7/ 10
Strong
Safety
4.4/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
SwapZilla
Swap aggregator with a Monero-routed private mode and merchant payment links
Privacy
3.1/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.0/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| B2P Central | SwapZilla | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, XMR | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, SOL, TRX |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | No fees (homepage: "0% B2P Central fees") | No fee added on top of the provider's rate per FAQ |
| Not available in | Not published | Iran, North Korea, Syria, Cuba, Crimea and Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine per terms |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only B2P Central
No email neededNo phone needed
Both
No registrationThird-party liquidity
Only SwapZilla
Tor onion serviceAccepts MoneroAML screeningMay request IDClosed sourceAnonymous operator
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is B2P Central or SwapZilla safer?
B2P Central has the higher Safety grade: B2P Central 4.4, SwapZilla 3.0, out of 10.
Does B2P Central or SwapZilla require KYC?
B2P Central is KYC level 0 (ID never required). SwapZilla is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
B2P Central has 0 and SwapZilla has 0 documented incidents in the registry.