AnonExch vs TorrentSwap
AnonExch has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 4.3 against 3.4, and Privacy 8.7 against 3.4.
AnonExch
Swap aggregator whose terms rule out KYC, AML screening and held funds
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
4.3/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
TorrentSwap
Cross-chain swap aggregator routing via Chainflip, NEAR Intents and Flashnet, no account
Privacy
3.4/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.4/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AnonExch | TorrentSwap | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, ZEC | BTC, ETH, SOL, USDT, USDC, LTC, ZEC, DOGE |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | Homepage: fees typically 0.4%, already included in the quoted receive amount | TorrentSwap, protocol and network fees included in the quoted amount; a flat 0.5% TorrentSwap fee is stated for API and agent swaps |
| Limits | Per-asset minimums; no maximum stated | Minimums, and sometimes maximums, set by the executing protocol and shown in the swap box |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AnonExch
Tor onion serviceAccepts MoneroNo-logs policyRefund without IDRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededThird-party liquidityClosed sourceAnonymous operator
Only TorrentSwap
AML screening
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is AnonExch or TorrentSwap safer?
AnonExch has the higher Safety grade: AnonExch 4.3, TorrentSwap 3.4, out of 10.
Does AnonExch or TorrentSwap require KYC?
AnonExch is KYC level 0 (ID never required). TorrentSwap is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
AnonExch has 0 and TorrentSwap has 0 documented incidents in the registry.