AnonExch vs Swapzone
AnonExch has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 4.3 against 3.7, and Privacy 8.7 against 3.4.
AnonExch
Swap aggregator whose terms rule out KYC, AML screening and held funds
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
4.3/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Swapzone
Non-custodial swap aggregator with no account and no added platform fee
Privacy
3.4/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.7/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AnonExch | Swapzone | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, ZEC | BTC, ETH, XMR, USDT, SOL, LTC, ZEC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Homepage: fees typically 0.4%, already included in the quoted receive amount | Swapzone fee stated as 0%; partner margin is included in each quote |
| Limits | Per-asset minimums; no maximum stated | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AnonExch
No email neededNo phone neededTor onion serviceNo-logs policyRefund without IDAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationAccepts MoneroThird-party liquidityClosed source
Only Swapzone
May request ID
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is AnonExch or Swapzone safer?
AnonExch has the higher Safety grade: AnonExch 4.3, Swapzone 3.7, out of 10.
Does AnonExch or Swapzone require KYC?
AnonExch is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Swapzone is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
AnonExch has 0 and Swapzone has 0 documented incidents in the registry.