AnonExch vs OrangeFren
AnonExch has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 4.3 against 4.1, and Privacy 8.7 against 4.9.
AnonExch
Swap aggregator whose terms rule out KYC, AML screening and held funds
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
4.3/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
OrangeFren
Rate comparison for KYC-free swap services with a never-KYC filter
Privacy
4.9/ 10
Caution
Safety
4.1/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AnonExch | OrangeFren | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, SOL, TRX, ZEC | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Homepage: fees typically 0.4%, already included in the quoted receive amount | Not published |
| Limits | Per-asset minimums; no maximum stated | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AnonExch
No-logs policyRefund without IDAnonymous operator
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededTor onion serviceAccepts MoneroThird-party liquidityClosed sourceRuns an affiliate programme
Only OrangeFren
Nothing distinct
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is AnonExch or OrangeFren safer?
AnonExch has the higher Safety grade: AnonExch 4.3, OrangeFren 4.1, out of 10.
Does AnonExch or OrangeFren require KYC?
AnonExch is KYC level 0 (ID never required). OrangeFren is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
AnonExch has 0 and OrangeFren has 0 documented incidents in the registry.