CypherGoat vs Husher
CypherGoat has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.2 against 3.4, and Privacy 5.4 against 2.3.
CypherGoat
Swap aggregator with an open-source front end and Tor access
Privacy
5.4/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Husher
Swap router that passes orders to third-party exchange providers, with multi-wallet payouts
Privacy
2.3/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.4/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| CypherGoat | Husher | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, BCH, SOL, DOGE | BTC, ETH, BNB, SOL, USDT, ZEC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Lightning | Crypto |
| Fees | Typically 0.4–0.6% per swap, per the site | Platform fee plus provider and network fees; swaps under $200 carry no platform or provider fee per the docs |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Panama |
| Not available in | Not published | Terms 2.2: United States, Canada, Spain, France, Germany, Malta, Lithuania, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, sanctioned countries and others |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only CypherGoat
No email neededNo phone neededTor onion serviceAccepts MoneroAccepts LightningOpen source
Both
No registrationThird-party liquidityRuns an affiliate programme
Only Husher
AML screeningMay request IDExcludes US usersClosed source
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is CypherGoat or Husher safer?
CypherGoat has the higher Safety grade: CypherGoat 5.2, Husher 3.4, out of 10.
Does CypherGoat or Husher require KYC?
CypherGoat is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). Husher is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
CypherGoat has 0 and Husher has 0 documented incidents in the registry.