OrangeFren vs Swapzone
OrangeFren has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 4.1 against 3.7, and Privacy 4.9 against 3.4.
OrangeFren
Rate comparison for KYC-free swap services with a never-KYC filter
Privacy
4.9/ 10
Caution
Safety
4.1/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Swapzone
Non-custodial swap aggregator with no account and no added platform fee
Privacy
3.4/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.7/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| OrangeFren | Swapzone | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Swap Aggregators | Swap Aggregators |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT | BTC, ETH, XMR, USDT, SOL, LTC, ZEC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Not published | Swapzone fee stated as 0%; partner margin is included in each quote |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only OrangeFren
No email neededNo phone neededTor onion serviceRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationAccepts MoneroThird-party liquidityClosed source
Only Swapzone
May request ID
Where they sit among swap aggregators
Questions
Is OrangeFren or Swapzone safer?
OrangeFren has the higher Safety grade: OrangeFren 4.1, Swapzone 3.7, out of 10.
Does OrangeFren or Swapzone require KYC?
OrangeFren is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). Swapzone is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
OrangeFren has 0 and Swapzone has 0 documented incidents in the registry.