SporeStack vs StealthVM
SporeStack has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 5.1, and Privacy 8.7 against 4.7.
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
StealthVM
UK-registered VPS and Windows RDP host in Sweden and the Netherlands, crypto or card
Privacy
4.7/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.1/ 10
Caution
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| SporeStack | StealthVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID in rare cases |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Random account number | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | XMR, BTC, BCH | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, BNB, TRX |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero, Card |
| Fees | Not published | VPS from €6.99/month when checked |
| Founded | 2017 | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | United Kingdom |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only SporeStack
No email neededNo phone neededAccount-number loginTor onion service5+ years operatingRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Accepts Monero
Only StealthVM
Legal entity disclosedRequires emailMay request ID
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is SporeStack or StealthVM safer?
SporeStack has the higher Safety grade: SporeStack 6.0, StealthVM 5.1, out of 10.
Does SporeStack or StealthVM require KYC?
SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required). StealthVM is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases).
Which has more incidents on record?
SporeStack has 0 and StealthVM has 0 documented incidents in the registry.