SporeStack vs VPSBG
It is a trade-off. VPSBG has the higher Safety grade (6.5 against 6.0), while SporeStack has the higher Privacy grade (8.7 against 5.9).
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
VPSBG
Bulgarian cloud host with no ID or phone verification, accepting Bitcoin since 2014
Privacy
5.9/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| SporeStack | VPSBG | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Random account number | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | XMR, BTC, BCH | BTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | Not published | Cloud VPS from €9.38/month when checked |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Bulgaria |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only SporeStack
No email neededAccount-number loginTor onion serviceAccepts MoneroRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No phone needed5+ years operating
Only VPSBG
Legal entity disclosedRequires email
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is SporeStack or VPSBG safer?
VPSBG has the higher Safety grade: SporeStack 6.0, VPSBG 6.5, out of 10.
Does SporeStack or VPSBG require KYC?
SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required). VPSBG is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
SporeStack has 0 and VPSBG has 0 documented incidents in the registry.