PayPerQ (PPQ.AI) vs Routstr
Routstr has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.1 against 5.0, and Privacy 8.6 against 8.3.
PayPerQ (PPQ.AI)
Pay-per-query access to many AI models with no registration; crypto or card
Privacy
8.3/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Routstr
Open protocol for pay-per-request AI inference paid with Cashu ecash and Lightning
Privacy
8.6/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| PayPerQ (PPQ.AI) | Routstr | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Private AI | Private AI |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Lightning, Card | Crypto, Lightning |
| Fees | Pay per query, no subscription; minimum top-up about $0.10 | Per-request pricing set by each provider |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Decentralised / none |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only PayPerQ (PPQ.AI)
No-logs policy
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts Lightning
Only Routstr
Open sourceSelf-hostable
Where they sit among private ai
Questions
Is PayPerQ (PPQ.AI) or Routstr safer?
Routstr has the higher Safety grade: PayPerQ (PPQ.AI) 5.0, Routstr 6.1, out of 10.
Does PayPerQ (PPQ.AI) or Routstr require KYC?
PayPerQ (PPQ.AI) is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Routstr is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
PayPerQ (PPQ.AI) has 0 and Routstr has 0 documented incidents in the registry.