MonoVM vs SporeStack
SporeStack has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 5.6, and Privacy 8.7 against 2.5.
MonoVM
VPS and RDP seller since 2011 that markets Bitcoin payment but requires KYC for refunds
Privacy
2.5/ 10
Poor
Safety
5.6/ 10
Fair
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| MonoVM | SporeStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Random account number |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT | XMR, BTC, BCH |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, PayPal | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Linux crypto VPS from $5.99/month (billed semiannually) when checked | Not published |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
| Not available in | Cuba,Iran,North Korea,Syria,Sudan,Ukraine | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only MonoVM
Requires emailMay request ID
Both
5+ years operatingRuns an affiliate programme
Only SporeStack
No email neededNo phone neededAccount-number loginTor onion serviceAccepts Monero
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is MonoVM or SporeStack safer?
SporeStack has the higher Safety grade: MonoVM 5.6, SporeStack 6.0, out of 10.
Does MonoVM or SporeStack require KYC?
MonoVM is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
MonoVM has 0 and SporeStack has 0 documented incidents in the registry.