IncogNET vs MonoVM
IncogNET has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.5 against 5.6, and Privacy 6.2 against 2.5.
IncogNET
Privacy-focused VPS, web hosting and domains from a US-registered LLC
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
MonoVM
VPS and RDP seller since 2011 that markets Bitcoin payment but requires KYC for refunds
Privacy
2.5/ 10
Poor
Safety
5.6/ 10
Fair
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| IncogNET | MonoVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | Not published | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Card, PayPal |
| Fees | KVM VPS from $4.62/month when checked | Linux crypto VPS from $5.99/month (billed semiannually) when checked |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
| Jurisdiction | United States | Not published |
| Not available in | Not published | Cuba,Iran,North Korea,Syria,Sudan,Ukraine |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only IncogNET
Tor onion serviceLegal entity disclosed
Both
5+ years operatingRequires email
Only MonoVM
May request IDRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is IncogNET or MonoVM safer?
IncogNET has the higher Safety grade: IncogNET 6.5, MonoVM 5.6, out of 10.
Does IncogNET or MonoVM require KYC?
IncogNET is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). MonoVM is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
IncogNET has 0 and MonoVM has 0 documented incidents in the registry.