MonoVM vs RDP.sh
RDP.sh has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.5 against 5.6, and Privacy 6.2 against 2.5.
MonoVM
VPS and RDP seller since 2011 that markets Bitcoin payment but requires KYC for refunds
Privacy
2.5/ 10
Poor
Safety
5.6/ 10
Fair
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
RDP.sh
German-run Windows RDP and Linux VPS host that takes cards and crypto
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| MonoVM | RDP.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT | BTC, ETH, XMR, USDT, LTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, PayPal | Crypto, Monero, Card |
| Fees | Linux crypto VPS from $5.99/month (billed semiannually) when checked | VPS from €3/month; Windows RDP plans from €10/month when checked |
| Limits | Not published | 14-day right of withdrawal for consumers under the terms |
| Founded | 2011 | 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Germany |
| Not available in | Cuba,Iran,North Korea,Syria,Sudan,Ukraine | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only MonoVM
May request IDRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Requires email5+ years operating
Only RDP.sh
Accepts MoneroLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is MonoVM or RDP.sh safer?
RDP.sh has the higher Safety grade: MonoVM 5.6, RDP.sh 6.5, out of 10.
Does MonoVM or RDP.sh require KYC?
MonoVM is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). RDP.sh is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
MonoVM has 0 and RDP.sh has 0 documented incidents in the registry.