BTCVPS vs RDP.sh
It is a trade-off. RDP.sh has the higher Safety grade (6.5 against 5.2), while BTCVPS has the higher Privacy grade (7.4 against 6.2).
BTCVPS
Crypto-only KVM VPS host in the Netherlands and Lithuania with email-only signup
Privacy
7.4/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
RDP.sh
German-run Windows RDP and Linux VPS host that takes cards and crypto
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BTCVPS | RDP.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, USDT, BCH, DASH, LTC, FIRO | BTC, ETH, XMR, USDT, LTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero, Card |
| Fees | VPS from €6/month when checked | VPS from €3/month; Windows RDP plans from €10/month when checked |
| Limits | 15-day refund in the original cryptocurrency; no refund if suspended for abuse | 14-day right of withdrawal for consumers under the terms |
| Founded | Not published | 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Netherlands | Germany |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BTCVPS
No phone neededWorks without JavaScriptRefund without IDAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Accepts MoneroRequires email
Only RDP.sh
5+ years operatingLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is BTCVPS or RDP.sh safer?
RDP.sh has the higher Safety grade: BTCVPS 5.2, RDP.sh 6.5, out of 10.
Does BTCVPS or RDP.sh require KYC?
BTCVPS is KYC level 0 (ID never required). RDP.sh is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
BTCVPS has 0 and RDP.sh has 0 documented incidents in the registry.