BTCVPS vs IncogNET
It is a trade-off. IncogNET has the higher Safety grade (6.5 against 5.2), while BTCVPS has the higher Privacy grade (7.4 against 6.2).
BTCVPS
Crypto-only KVM VPS host in the Netherlands and Lithuania with email-only signup
Privacy
7.4/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
IncogNET
Privacy-focused VPS, web hosting and domains from a US-registered LLC
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BTCVPS | IncogNET | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, USDT, BCH, DASH, LTC, FIRO | Not published |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | VPS from €6/month when checked | KVM VPS from $4.62/month when checked |
| Limits | 15-day refund in the original cryptocurrency; no refund if suspended for abuse | Not published |
| Founded | Not published | 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Netherlands | United States |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BTCVPS
No phone neededWorks without JavaScriptAccepts MoneroRefund without IDAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Requires email
Only IncogNET
Tor onion service5+ years operatingLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is BTCVPS or IncogNET safer?
IncogNET has the higher Safety grade: BTCVPS 5.2, IncogNET 6.5, out of 10.
Does BTCVPS or IncogNET require KYC?
BTCVPS is KYC level 0 (ID never required). IncogNET is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
BTCVPS has 0 and IncogNET has 0 documented incidents in the registry.