BitLaunch vs SporeStack
They are level on Safety. SporeStack has the higher Privacy grade, 8.7 against 5.8.
BitLaunch
Crypto-billed reseller of DigitalOcean, Vultr and Linode cloud servers
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BitLaunch | SporeStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Random account number |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC | XMR, BTC, BCH |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BitLaunch
Requires email
Both
5+ years operating
Only SporeStack
No email neededNo phone neededAccount-number loginTor onion serviceAccepts MoneroRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is BitLaunch or SporeStack safer?
They have the same Safety grade, 6.0 out of 10.
Does BitLaunch or SporeStack require KYC?
BitLaunch is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
BitLaunch has 0 and SporeStack has 0 documented incidents in the registry.