BitLaunch vs IncogNET
IncogNET has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.5 against 6.0, and Privacy 6.2 against 5.8.
BitLaunch
Crypto-billed reseller of DigitalOcean, Vultr and Linode cloud servers
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
IncogNET
Privacy-focused VPS, web hosting and domains from a US-registered LLC
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BitLaunch | IncogNET | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC | Not published |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto |
| Fees | Not published | KVM VPS from $4.62/month when checked |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | United States |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BitLaunch
Nothing distinct
Both
Requires email5+ years operating
Only IncogNET
Tor onion serviceLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is BitLaunch or IncogNET safer?
IncogNET has the higher Safety grade: BitLaunch 6.0, IncogNET 6.5, out of 10.
Does BitLaunch or IncogNET require KYC?
BitLaunch is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). IncogNET is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
BitLaunch has 0 and IncogNET has 0 documented incidents in the registry.