3v-Hosting vs BitLaunch
It is a trade-off. 3v-Hosting has the higher Safety grade (6.1 against 6.0), while BitLaunch has the higher Privacy grade (5.8 against 2.9).
3v-Hosting
Ukrainian VPS and dedicated server host in Ukraine and the Netherlands, takes Monero
Privacy
2.9/ 10
Poor
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
BitLaunch
Crypto-billed reseller of DigitalOcean, Vultr and Linode cloud servers
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| 3v-Hosting | BitLaunch | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, LTC, ETH, USDT, BCH, DASH, ZEC | BTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Card, PayPal | Crypto |
| Fees | VPS from $6.30/month when checked | Not published |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | Ukraine | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only 3v-Hosting
Accepts MoneroLegal entity disclosedRuns an affiliate programmeMay request ID
Both
5+ years operatingRequires email
Only BitLaunch
Nothing distinct
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is 3v-Hosting or BitLaunch safer?
3v-Hosting has the higher Safety grade: 3v-Hosting 6.1, BitLaunch 6.0, out of 10.
Does 3v-Hosting or BitLaunch require KYC?
3v-Hosting is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). BitLaunch is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
3v-Hosting has 0 and BitLaunch has 0 documented incidents in the registry.