Routstr vs Sats4AI
Routstr has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.1 against 5.2, and Privacy 8.6 against 8.3.
Routstr
Open protocol for pay-per-request AI inference paid with Cashu ecash and Lightning
Privacy
8.6/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Sats4AI
Pay-per-use AI tools paid in Lightning sats, with no account, email or API key
Privacy
8.3/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Routstr | Sats4AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Private AI | Private AI |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Lightning | Lightning |
| Fees | Per-request pricing set by each provider | Per use, e.g. translation from 1 sat, background removal 44 sats, AI voice calls from about 150 sats per minute |
| Jurisdiction | Decentralised / none | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Routstr
Open sourceSelf-hostable
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts Lightning
Only Sats4AI
Refund without IDAnonymous operator
Where they sit among private ai
Questions
Is Routstr or Sats4AI safer?
Routstr has the higher Safety grade: Routstr 6.1, Sats4AI 5.2, out of 10.
Does Routstr or Sats4AI require KYC?
Routstr is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Sats4AI is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
Routstr has 0 and Sats4AI has 0 documented incidents in the registry.