PrivateAlps vs RDP.sh
It is a trade-off. RDP.sh has the higher Safety grade (6.5 against 4.6), while PrivateAlps has the higher Privacy grade (7.2 against 6.2).
PrivateAlps
Swiss-based VPS, RDP and dedicated server host paid in cryptocurrency
Privacy
7.2/ 10
Strong
Safety
4.6/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
RDP.sh
German-run Windows RDP and Linux VPS host that takes cards and crypto
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| PrivateAlps | RDP.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC, ETH, XMR, USDT, LTC |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero, Card |
| Fees | Linux VPS from €12.90/month when checked | VPS from €3/month; Windows RDP plans from €10/month when checked |
| Limits | Payments and deposits are non-refundable except for verified faults on the provider's side | 14-day right of withdrawal for consumers under the terms |
| Founded | Not published | 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Switzerland | Germany |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only PrivateAlps
Tor onion serviceNo-logs policyAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Requires email
Only RDP.sh
Accepts Monero5+ years operatingLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is PrivateAlps or RDP.sh safer?
RDP.sh has the higher Safety grade: PrivateAlps 4.6, RDP.sh 6.5, out of 10.
Does PrivateAlps or RDP.sh require KYC?
PrivateAlps is KYC level 0 (ID never required). RDP.sh is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
PrivateAlps has 0 and RDP.sh has 0 documented incidents in the registry.