LuxHost vs SporeStack
SporeStack has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 4.2, and Privacy 8.7 against 4.3.
LuxHost
Reseller of VPS and domain names paid by crypto or card, managed from one account
Privacy
4.3/ 10
Caution
Safety
4.2/ 10
Caution
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| LuxHost | SporeStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID in rare cases | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Random account number |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | Not published | XMR, BTC, BCH |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card | Crypto, Monero |
| Founded | Not published | 2017 |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only LuxHost
Requires emailAnonymous operatorMay request ID
Both
Nothing distinct
Only SporeStack
No email neededNo phone neededAccount-number loginTor onion serviceAccepts Monero5+ years operatingRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is LuxHost or SporeStack safer?
SporeStack has the higher Safety grade: LuxHost 4.2, SporeStack 6.0, out of 10.
Does LuxHost or SporeStack require KYC?
LuxHost is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases). SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
LuxHost has 0 and SporeStack has 0 documented incidents in the registry.