IncogNET vs StealthVM
IncogNET has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.5 against 5.1, and Privacy 6.2 against 4.7.
IncogNET
Privacy-focused VPS, web hosting and domains from a US-registered LLC
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
StealthVM
UK-registered VPS and Windows RDP host in Sweden and the Netherlands, crypto or card
Privacy
4.7/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.1/ 10
Caution
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| IncogNET | StealthVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID in rare cases |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | Not published | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, BNB, TRX |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero, Card |
| Fees | KVM VPS from $4.62/month when checked | VPS from €6.99/month when checked |
| Founded | 2020 | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | United States | United Kingdom |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only IncogNET
Tor onion service5+ years operating
Both
Legal entity disclosedRequires email
Only StealthVM
Accepts MoneroMay request ID
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is IncogNET or StealthVM safer?
IncogNET has the higher Safety grade: IncogNET 6.5, StealthVM 5.1, out of 10.
Does IncogNET or StealthVM require KYC?
IncogNET is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). StealthVM is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases).
Which has more incidents on record?
IncogNET has 0 and StealthVM has 0 documented incidents in the registry.