Cockbox vs IncogNET
It is a trade-off. IncogNET has the higher Safety grade (6.5 against 4.6), while Cockbox has the higher Privacy grade (6.6 against 6.2).
Cockbox
Tor-friendly VPS provider billing in Bitcoin or Monero
Privacy
6.6/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.6/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
IncogNET
Privacy-focused VPS, web hosting and domains from a US-registered LLC
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Cockbox | IncogNET | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email optional | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, XMR | Not published |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | From $15/month (2 GB) when checked | KVM VPS from $4.62/month when checked |
| Founded | Not published | 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | United States |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Cockbox
Accepts MoneroAnonymous operatorRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Nothing distinct
Only IncogNET
Tor onion service5+ years operatingLegal entity disclosedRequires email
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is Cockbox or IncogNET safer?
IncogNET has the higher Safety grade: Cockbox 4.6, IncogNET 6.5, out of 10.
Does Cockbox or IncogNET require KYC?
Cockbox is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). IncogNET is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Cockbox has 0 and IncogNET has 0 documented incidents in the registry.