Bitrequest vs Cryptomus
Bitrequest has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.0 against 3.5, and Privacy 9.0 against 0.0.
Bitrequest
Open-source app for creating crypto payment requests and watching them arrive
Privacy
9.0/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.0/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Cryptomus
Popular custodial crypto payment gateway and wallet; full access requires KYC
Privacy
0.0/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.5/ 10
Poor
ID mandatory KYC 4 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Bitrequest | Cryptomus | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payment Gateways | Payment Gateways |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID mandatory |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | Not published |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, BCH, DOGE, DASH, KAS | BTC, ETH, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Lightning | Crypto |
| Fees | Free software; no fees listed | Payment gateway: 2% per transaction for new users, from 0.4% on request |
| Not available in | Not published | Terms exclude citizens and residents of the United States and countries listed in its AML policy |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Bitrequest
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroAccepts LightningOpen sourceNon-custodial
Both
Nothing distinct
Only Cryptomus
CustodialClosed sourceMay request IDAML screeningExcludes US usersRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among payment gateways
Questions
Is Bitrequest or Cryptomus safer?
Bitrequest has the higher Safety grade: Bitrequest 7.0, Cryptomus 3.5, out of 10.
Does Bitrequest or Cryptomus require KYC?
Bitrequest is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Cryptomus is KYC level 4 (ID mandatory).
Which has more incidents on record?
Bitrequest has 0 and Cryptomus has 0 documented incidents in the registry.