Bitrequest vs SHKeeper
It is a trade-off. SHKeeper has the higher Safety grade (7.3 against 7.0), while Bitrequest has the higher Privacy grade (9.0 against 8.8).
Bitrequest
Open-source app for creating crypto payment requests and watching them arrive
Privacy
9.0/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.0/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
SHKeeper
Self-hosted open-source crypto payment gateway with no transaction fees
Privacy
8.8/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.3/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Bitrequest | SHKeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payment Gateways | Payment Gateways |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, BCH, DOGE, DASH, KAS | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, TRX |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Lightning | Crypto |
| Fees | Free software; no fees listed | No payment fee |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Decentralised / none |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Bitrequest
Accepts MoneroAccepts Lightning
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededOpen sourceNon-custodial
Only SHKeeper
Self-hostable
Where they sit among payment gateways
Questions
Is Bitrequest or SHKeeper safer?
SHKeeper has the higher Safety grade: Bitrequest 7.0, SHKeeper 7.3, out of 10.
Does Bitrequest or SHKeeper require KYC?
Bitrequest is KYC level 0 (ID never required). SHKeeper is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
Bitrequest has 0 and SHKeeper has 0 documented incidents in the registry.