Bitcart vs Bitrequest
Bitcart has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.3 against 7.0, and Privacy 9.2 against 9.0.
Bitcart
Self-hosted open-source payment processor supporting 50+ coins including Monero
Privacy
9.2/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.3/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Bitrequest
Open-source app for creating crypto payment requests and watching them arrive
Privacy
9.0/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.0/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Bitcart | Bitrequest | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payment Gateways | Payment Gateways |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, TRX, XMR, USDT, USDC, BNB | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, BCH, DOGE, DASH, KAS |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero, Lightning |
| Fees | 0% processing fees | Free software; no fees listed |
| Jurisdiction | Decentralised / none | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Bitcart
Self-hostable
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroOpen sourceNon-custodial
Only Bitrequest
Accepts Lightning
Where they sit among payment gateways
Questions
Is Bitcart or Bitrequest safer?
Bitcart has the higher Safety grade: Bitcart 7.3, Bitrequest 7.0, out of 10.
Does Bitcart or Bitrequest require KYC?
Bitcart is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Bitrequest is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
Bitcart has 0 and Bitrequest has 0 documented incidents in the registry.