Bitrequest vs Coinsnap
Bitrequest has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.0 against 6.7, and Privacy 9.0 against 6.2.
Bitrequest
Open-source app for creating crypto payment requests and watching them arrive
Privacy
9.0/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.0/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Coinsnap
Non-custodial Bitcoin and Lightning checkout plugins for shops; sign-up by email
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.7/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Bitrequest | Coinsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payment Gateways | Payment Gateways |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | No account needed | Email required |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, LTC, BCH, DOGE, DASH, KAS | BTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Lightning | Crypto, Lightning |
| Fees | Free software; no fees listed | 1% transaction fee, charged against prepaid Coinsnap credit |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Serbia |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Bitrequest
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroOpen source
Both
Accepts LightningNon-custodial
Only Coinsnap
Requires emailLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among payment gateways
Questions
Is Bitrequest or Coinsnap safer?
Bitrequest has the higher Safety grade: Bitrequest 7.0, Coinsnap 6.7, out of 10.
Does Bitrequest or Coinsnap require KYC?
Bitrequest is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Coinsnap is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Bitrequest has 0 and Coinsnap has 0 documented incidents in the registry.