BitLaunch vs is*hosting
BitLaunch has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 4.8, and Privacy 5.8 against 2.6.
BitLaunch
Crypto-billed reseller of DigitalOcean, Vultr and Linode cloud servers
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
is*hosting
Estonian VPS and dedicated host in 40+ locations with risk-based KYC
Privacy
2.6/ 10
Poor
Safety
4.8/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BitLaunch | is*hosting | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, XMR, ZEC, DASH, TRX, BNB |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero, Card |
| Founded | 2017 | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Estonia |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BitLaunch
Requires email5+ years operating
Both
Nothing distinct
Only is*hosting
Accepts MoneroMay request IDAML screeningLegal entity disclosedRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is BitLaunch or is*hosting safer?
BitLaunch has the higher Safety grade: BitLaunch 6.0, is*hosting 4.8, out of 10.
Does BitLaunch or is*hosting require KYC?
BitLaunch is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). is*hosting is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
BitLaunch has 0 and is*hosting has 0 documented incidents in the registry.