BitLaunch vs BlueVPS
It is a trade-off. BlueVPS has the higher Safety grade (6.1 against 6.0), while BitLaunch has the higher Privacy grade (5.8 against 2.9).
BitLaunch
Crypto-billed reseller of DigitalOcean, Vultr and Linode cloud servers
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
BlueVPS
Estonian VPS host in 20 locations that accepts Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin and USDT
Privacy
2.9/ 10
Poor
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BitLaunch | BlueVPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Card, PayPal, Bank transfer |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Estonia |
| Not available in | Not published | Iran,Russia,Turkmenistan |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BitLaunch
Requires email
Both
5+ years operating
Only BlueVPS
May request IDLegal entity disclosedRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is BitLaunch or BlueVPS safer?
BlueVPS has the higher Safety grade: BitLaunch 6.0, BlueVPS 6.1, out of 10.
Does BitLaunch or BlueVPS require KYC?
BitLaunch is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). BlueVPS is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
BitLaunch has 0 and BlueVPS has 0 documented incidents in the registry.