is*hosting vs SporeStack
SporeStack has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 4.8, and Privacy 8.7 against 2.6.
is*hosting
Estonian VPS and dedicated host in 40+ locations with risk-based KYC
Privacy
2.6/ 10
Poor
Safety
4.8/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| is*hosting | SporeStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Random account number |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, XMR, ZEC, DASH, TRX, BNB | XMR, BTC, BCH |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Card | Crypto, Monero |
| Founded | Not published | 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | Estonia | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only is*hosting
May request IDAML screeningLegal entity disclosed
Both
Accepts MoneroRuns an affiliate programme
Only SporeStack
No email neededNo phone neededAccount-number loginTor onion service5+ years operating
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is is*hosting or SporeStack safer?
SporeStack has the higher Safety grade: is*hosting 4.8, SporeStack 6.0, out of 10.
Does is*hosting or SporeStack require KYC?
is*hosting is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
is*hosting has 0 and SporeStack has 0 documented incidents in the registry.