HostZealot vs Ko-Net
It is a trade-off. HostZealot has the higher Safety grade (6.5 against 5.6), while Ko-Net has the higher Privacy grade (8.8 against 5.8).
HostZealot
VPS and dedicated host in 25+ locations, paid by card, PayPal, Bitcoin or USDT
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Ko-Net
Crypto-only VPS and DNS host in Stockholm with key-based accounts and no email
Privacy
8.8/ 10
Excellent
Safety
5.6/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| HostZealot | Ko-Net | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Random account number |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, USDT | XMR, BTC, LTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, PayPal, Bank transfer | Crypto, Monero, Lightning |
| Fees | VPS from EUR 6.49/month when checked | VPS from $10/month when checked |
| Limits | Not published | Refunds to crypto within 14 days, minus network fees; managed hosting hours are non-refundable |
| Founded | 2009 | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | Bulgaria | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only HostZealot
Requires emailLegal entity disclosed5+ years operating
Both
Runs an affiliate programme
Only Ko-Net
Account-number loginNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroAccepts LightningNo-logs policyRefund without ID
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is HostZealot or Ko-Net safer?
HostZealot has the higher Safety grade: HostZealot 6.5, Ko-Net 5.6, out of 10.
Does HostZealot or Ko-Net require KYC?
HostZealot is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). Ko-Net is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
HostZealot has 0 and Ko-Net has 0 documented incidents in the registry.