Coinsnap vs Heleket
Coinsnap has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.7 against 3.1, and Privacy 6.2 against 1.7.
Coinsnap
Non-custodial Bitcoin and Lightning checkout plugins for shops; sign-up by email
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.7/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Heleket
Custodial crypto payment processing for websites and Telegram bots, fees from 0.4%
Privacy
1.7/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.1/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Coinsnap | Heleket | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payment Gateways | Payment Gateways |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | Non Custodial | Custodial |
| Sign-up | Email required | Not published |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC, ETH, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Lightning | Crypto |
| Fees | 1% transaction fee, charged against prepaid Coinsnap credit | From 0.4% per payment, no connection fee |
| Jurisdiction | Serbia | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Coinsnap
Non-custodialAccepts LightningRequires emailLegal entity disclosed
Both
Nothing distinct
Only Heleket
CustodialClosed sourceMay request IDAML screeningAnonymous operator
Where they sit among payment gateways
Questions
Is Coinsnap or Heleket safer?
Coinsnap has the higher Safety grade: Coinsnap 6.7, Heleket 3.1, out of 10.
Does Coinsnap or Heleket require KYC?
Coinsnap is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). Heleket is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
Coinsnap has 0 and Heleket has 0 documented incidents in the registry.