BTCVPS vs SporeStack
SporeStack has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 5.2, and Privacy 8.7 against 7.4.
BTCVPS
Crypto-only KVM VPS host in the Netherlands and Lithuania with email-only signup
Privacy
7.4/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BTCVPS | SporeStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Random account number |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ETH, USDT, BCH, DASH, LTC, FIRO | XMR, BTC, BCH |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | VPS from €6/month when checked | Not published |
| Limits | 15-day refund in the original cryptocurrency; no refund if suspended for abuse | Not published |
| Founded | Not published | 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | Netherlands | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BTCVPS
Works without JavaScriptRefund without IDRequires emailAnonymous operator
Both
No phone neededAccepts MoneroRuns an affiliate programme
Only SporeStack
No email neededAccount-number loginTor onion service5+ years operating
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is BTCVPS or SporeStack safer?
SporeStack has the higher Safety grade: BTCVPS 5.2, SporeStack 6.0, out of 10.
Does BTCVPS or SporeStack require KYC?
BTCVPS is KYC level 0 (ID never required). SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
BTCVPS has 0 and SporeStack has 0 documented incidents in the registry.