BlueVPS vs IncogNET
IncogNET has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.5 against 6.1, and Privacy 6.2 against 2.9.
BlueVPS
Estonian VPS host in 20 locations that accepts Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin and USDT
Privacy
2.9/ 10
Poor
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
IncogNET
Privacy-focused VPS, web hosting and domains from a US-registered LLC
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| BlueVPS | IncogNET | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT | Not published |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, PayPal, Bank transfer | Crypto |
| Fees | Not published | KVM VPS from $4.62/month when checked |
| Founded | 2016 | 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Estonia | United States |
| Not available in | Iran,Russia,Turkmenistan | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only BlueVPS
May request IDRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Legal entity disclosed5+ years operating
Only IncogNET
Tor onion serviceRequires email
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is BlueVPS or IncogNET safer?
IncogNET has the higher Safety grade: BlueVPS 6.1, IncogNET 6.5, out of 10.
Does BlueVPS or IncogNET require KYC?
BlueVPS is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). IncogNET is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
BlueVPS has 0 and IncogNET has 0 documented incidents in the registry.